<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-15"?>
<!-- generator="Kukkaisvoima version 15" -->
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>
<channel>
<title>Tim's Bits and Pieces: Self-Defense</title>
<link>http://blog.timp.com.au</link>
<description>My personal blog, covering many random topics</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 23:03:54 +0200</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 23:03:54 +0200</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://23.fi/kukkaisvoima/</generator>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>I Like Guns
</title>
<link>http://blog.timp.com.au/i_like_guns%3A2010-01-01%3ALinkage%2CSelf-Defense</link>
<comments>http://blog.timp.com.au/i_like_guns%3A2010-01-01%3ALinkage%2CSelf-Defense#comments</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 23:03:54 +0200</pubDate>
<dc:creator>TimP</dc:creator>
<category>Linkage</category>
<category>Self-Defense</category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.timp.com.au/i_like_guns%3A2010-01-01%3ALinkage%2CSelf-Defense/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-TC2xTCb_GU">I Like Guns</a> by Steve
 [...]]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-TC2xTCb_GU">I Like Guns</a> by Steve
 Lee (an Australian singer)</p>
 
 <p><a
     href="http://booksbikesboomsticks.blogspot.com/2009/12/ending-year-with-bang.html">Via</a>.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.timp.com.au/i_like_guns%3A2010-01-01%3ALinkage%2CSelf-Defense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<title>Gun Control = Thunderdome
</title>
<link>http://blog.timp.com.au/gun_control_%3D_thunderdome%3A2009-08-28%3AJurisprudence%2CPolitics%2CSelf-Defense%2CLinkage%2CPhilosophy</link>
<comments>http://blog.timp.com.au/gun_control_%3D_thunderdome%3A2009-08-28%3AJurisprudence%2CPolitics%2CSelf-Defense%2CLinkage%2CPhilosophy#comments</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 23:03:57 +0200</pubDate>
<dc:creator>TimP</dc:creator>
<category>Jurisprudence</category>
<category>Politics</category>
<category>Self-Defense</category>
<category>Linkage</category>
<category>Philosophy</category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.timp.com.au/gun_control_%3D_thunderdome%3A2009-08-28%3AJurisprudence%2CPolitics%2CSelf-Defense%2CLinkage%2CPhilosophy/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>Marko Kloos is so very good at expressing why <a
 [...]]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Marko Kloos is so very good at expressing why <a
     href="http://munchkinwrangler.wordpress.com/2009/08/25/a-vote-for-gun-control-is-a-vote-for-thunderdome/">gun
     control sucks</a>, so rather than explain it myself I'll just link to
 him.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.timp.com.au/gun_control_%3D_thunderdome%3A2009-08-28%3AJurisprudence%2CPolitics%2CSelf-Defense%2CLinkage%2CPhilosophy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<title>Meditations on Violence
</title>
<link>http://blog.timp.com.au/meditations_on_violence%3A2009-07-04%3ABooks%2CReviews%2CSelf-Defense</link>
<comments>http://blog.timp.com.au/meditations_on_violence%3A2009-07-04%3ABooks%2CReviews%2CSelf-Defense#comments</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 23:03:54 +0200</pubDate>
<dc:creator>TimP</dc:creator>
<category>Books</category>
<category>Reviews</category>
<category>Self-Defense</category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.timp.com.au/meditations_on_violence%3A2009-07-04%3ABooks%2CReviews%2CSelf-Defense/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <p><a
 [...]]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><a
     href="http://www.fishpond.com.au/product_info.php?ref=1177&amp;products_id=12293061&amp;affiliate_banner_id=1">Meditations
     on Violence by Rory Miller</a> is a great book. Rather than discussing
 specific techniques, Miller discusses the intellectual and emotional
 components of violent encounters. He has spent over a decade working in
 prisons, so he certainly has extensive experience in the area of violence having
 been in hundreds of violent encounters with some of the worst criminals on the
 planet.</p>
 
 <p>And neither is it a dry, boring read; I read most of it in a single sitting,
 and only stopped because I needed to get up early the next morning. Useful and
 entertaining; I strongly recommend it. The only downside is that every now and
 again I read a paragraph and just sat there wondering what he was trying to say,
 but I have the same problem with my own writing sometimes so I won't hold it
 against him. :-)</p>
 
 <p>PS. Miller also has an <a
 href="http://chirontraining.blogspot.com/">interesting blog</a>.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.timp.com.au/meditations_on_violence%3A2009-07-04%3ABooks%2CReviews%2CSelf-Defense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<title>Interesting Links
</title>
<link>http://blog.timp.com.au/interesting_links%3A2009-05-27%3AJurisprudence%2CPersonal-Responsibility%2CPolitics%2CSelf-Defense%2CLinkage</link>
<comments>http://blog.timp.com.au/interesting_links%3A2009-05-27%3AJurisprudence%2CPersonal-Responsibility%2CPolitics%2CSelf-Defense%2CLinkage#comments</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 23:03:54 +0200</pubDate>
<dc:creator>TimP</dc:creator>
<category>Jurisprudence</category>
<category>Personal-Responsibility</category>
<category>Politics</category>
<category>Self-Defense</category>
<category>Linkage</category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.timp.com.au/interesting_links%3A2009-05-27%3AJurisprudence%2CPersonal-Responsibility%2CPolitics%2CSelf-Defense%2CLinkage/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>Since I haven't posted for a while, I thought I'd share a couple of
 [...]]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Since I haven't posted for a while, I thought I'd share a couple of
 interesting posts from other blogs that are well worth a read:</p>
 
 <p><a
     href="http://cluborlov.blogspot.com/2009/02/social-collapse-best-practices.html">ClubOrlov:
     Social Collapse Best Practices</a>, with some interesting tips on how to
 prepare for the coming economic collapse. <a href="#ref1_20090527">*</a></p>
 
 <p><a
     href="http://smallestminority.blogspot.com/2009/05/cultures-compare-and-contrast.html">The
     Smallest Minority: Cultures: Compare and Contrast</a>, a useful article
 which includes an overview of various studies on the effectiveness of gun
 control.</p>
 
 <p id="ref1_20090527">* Economic collapse subject to cancellation without
 notice.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.timp.com.au/interesting_links%3A2009-05-27%3AJurisprudence%2CPersonal-Responsibility%2CPolitics%2CSelf-Defense%2CLinkage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<title>Deaths by Firearms in comparison to Deaths by Motor Vehicles
</title>
<link>http://blog.timp.com.au/deaths_by_firearms_in_comparison_to_deaths_by_motor_vehicles%3A2008-12-20%3AJurisprudence%2CPolitics%2CSelf-Defense</link>
<comments>http://blog.timp.com.au/deaths_by_firearms_in_comparison_to_deaths_by_motor_vehicles%3A2008-12-20%3AJurisprudence%2CPolitics%2CSelf-Defense#comments</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:03:53 +0200</pubDate>
<dc:creator>TimP</dc:creator>
<category>Jurisprudence</category>
<category>Politics</category>
<category>Self-Defense</category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.timp.com.au/deaths_by_firearms_in_comparison_to_deaths_by_motor_vehicles%3A2008-12-20%3AJurisprudence%2CPolitics%2CSelf-Defense/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>A comparison of deaths caused by firearms to deaths caused by cars and
 [...]]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>A comparison of deaths caused by firearms to deaths caused by cars and
 motorbikes in Australia during 2006 (most recent year available). All tables including <a
     href="http://www.who.int/classifications/apps/icd/icd10online/">
     <acronym title="International Statistical Classification of Diseases
        and Related Health Problems"> ICD</acronym> codes</a> for cause of death.</p>
 
 <p>This first table provides a number that is deliberately way too high. Essentially
 I made three assumptions (all wrong) that raised the numbers as high as I could
 without producing numbers that are blatantly fraudulent. (Incredibly stupid,
 but not fraudulent) These three assumptions are:</p>
 
 <ol>
     <li>That all homicides with firearms are committed with legally licensed
     firearms. Actual numbers are around <a
         href="http://www.aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/tandi151.html">10%</a>,
     though of course some percentage of the none licensed firearms would have
     originally been stolen.</li>
 
     <li>That everyone that commits suicide with a firearm would, if they didn't have
     access to a firearm, simple give up on the idea of suicide. Given that the
     majority of people who commit suicide just want to die, and aren't overly
     concerned with the method, this is simply retarded.</li>
 
     <li>This table also radically exaggerates the number of accidental deaths
     caused by firearms, because the statistics I used did not specifically list
     accidental deaths by firearms, but instead grouped them together with
     several other types of accidental deaths. Historical data suggests that
     actual numbers where probably around a <a
         href="http://www.aic.gov.au/publications/tandi2/tandi269t.html#tab1">sixth
         of the value</a> show here.</li>
 </ol>
 
 <p>Result: <b>13.28</b> firearm deaths per 100,000 registered firearms. This
 number is <i>well and truly excessive</i>, but is listed here for comparison
 purposes.</p>
 
 <table border="1px solid" cellspacing="0px" cellpadding="3px">
     <tr>
         <th colspan="8">
             <a href="http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Latestproducts/970540FBE241B359CA257410000FBB30?opendocument">
             Firearm Deaths in Australia 2006, with <acronym
             title="International Statistical Classification of Diseases
             and Related Health Problems">ICD</acronym> codes</a> Version 1</th>
     </tr>
     <tr>
         <th colspan="3">Assault</th>
         <th colspan="3">Suicide</th>
         <th>Accidental</th>
         <th>Total</th>
     </tr>
 
     <tr>
         <td>X94</td>
         <td>X95</td>
         <td>X93 or Not Recorded<sup>1</sup></td>
 
         <td>X73</td>
         <td>X74</td>
         <td>X72 Est<sup>2</sup></td>
 
         <td>W20-W49 minus W26 <sup>3</sup></td>
 
         <td>&nbsp;</td>
     </tr>
 
     <tr>
         <td>11</td>
         <td>10</td>
         <td>20</td>
 
         <td>125</td>
         <td>20</td>
         <td>22</td>
 
         <td>124</td>
 
         <td>332</td>
     </tr>
 
     <tr>
         <th colspan="3">Number of Legally owned firearms <sup>4</sup></th>
         <th colspan="2">&nbsp;</th>
         <th colspan="3">Firearm Deaths per 100,000 firearms</th>
     </tr>
 
     <tr>
         <td colspan="3">2,500,000</td>
         <td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td>
         <td colspan="3">13.28</td>
     </tr>
 
     <tr>
         <th colspan="8">Notes</th>
     </tr>
 
     <tr>
         <td>1.</td>
         <td colspan="7">"X93 or Not Recorded" is included because my
             <a href="http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Latestproducts/970540FBE241B359CA257410000FBB30?opendocument">
             primary resource</a>
             for this table did not include
             <a href="http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/39433889d406eeb9ca2570610019e9a5/3ae19ab82f2745cfca256c8a007b0e55!OpenDocument#72%20The%20number%20of%20deaths%20record">
             all homicides</a>, and also didn't
             specifically state the number of homicides for pistols. The
             <a href="http://www.aic.gov.au/research/homicide/stats/weapon.html">
             Australian Institute of Criminology</a>'s data put firearms
             homicides is approximately 40.</td>
     </tr>
 
     <tr>
         <td>2.</td>
         <td colspan="7">My primary source again did not include the values for
             pistol deaths. I estimated this at 22 based on the assumption that
             they would not have made the total firearm suicide rate higher than for 
             <a href="http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/allprimarymainfeatures/C3374C4F71C1583ACA25729D0010CF4A?opendocument">
             2004</a> which had a noticeably higher overall suicide rate: 2,098 vs. 1,799.</td>
     </tr>
 
     <tr>
         <td>3.</td>
         <td colspan="7">My primary source listed all accidental deaths caused by "Exposure to
             inanimate mechanical forces (W20-W49)" as a single category with
             only one sub-category: "Contact with knife, sword or dagger (W26)".</td>
     </tr>
 
     <tr>
         <td>4.</td>
         <td colspan="7">This approximate figure is taken from 
             <a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/Library/pubs/bn/2007-08/08bn01.htm">
             The Australian Parliamentary Library's <i>Firearms in Australia: a guide to electronic resources</i></a></td>
     </tr>
 </table>
 
 <p>The numbers provided in this second table are possibly low. It corrects the
 three broken assumptions from the first table, but it may perhaps have gone to
 far the other way. Firstly I don't take into account murders committed with
 stolen firearms, and secondly I assume here that all suicides committed with
 firearms would still be successful by other means.</p>
 
 <p>Result: <b>1.16</b> firearm deaths per 100,000 registered firearms. While a
 reasoned argument could be made for the results in this table, I will, for the
 sake of argument, assume that this value is too low.</p>
 
 <table border="1px solid" cellspacing="0px" cellpadding="3px">
     <tr>
         <th colspan="8">
             <a href="http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Latestproducts/970540FBE241B359CA257410000FBB30?opendocument">
             Firearm Deaths in Australia 2006, with <acronym
             title="International Statistical Classification of Diseases
             and Related Health Problems">ICD</acronym> codes</a> Version 2</th>
     </tr>
     <tr>
         <th colspan="3">Assault</th>
         <th colspan="3">Suicide</th>
         <th>Accidental</th>
         <th>Total</th>
     </tr>
 
     <tr>
         <td>X94</td>
         <td>X95</td>
         <td>X93 or Not Recorded</td>
 
         <td>X73</td>
         <td>X74</td>
         <td>X72 Est</td>
 
         <td>W20-W49 minus W26</td>
 
         <td>&nbsp;</td>
     </tr>
 
     <tr>
         <td>1.1</td>
         <td>1</td>
         <td>2</td>
 
         <td>0</td>
         <td>0</td>
         <td>0</td>
 
         <td>25</td>
 
         <td>29.1</td>
     </tr>
 
     <tr>
         <th colspan="3">Number of Legally owned firearms</th>
         <th colspan="2">&nbsp;</th>
         <th colspan="3">Firearm Deaths per 100,000 firearms</th>
     </tr>
 
     <tr>
         <td colspan="3">2,500,000</td>
         <td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td>
         <td colspan="3">1.16</td>
     </tr>
 </table>
 
 <p>The numbers in this third table correct the faults listed for the second
 table, by assuming that 75% of all murders are committed with either a legally
 licensed firearm or a stolen firearm, and that 20% of people who commit suicide
 with a firearm would simply give up or fail if they didn't have access to a firearm.</p>
 
 <p>Result: <b>3.57</b> firearm deaths per 100,000 registered firearms. I tend to
 think this is a little higher than the actual numbers, but we'll pretend it's
 accurate for the comparison with motor vehicles.</p>
 
 <table border="1px solid" cellspacing="0px" cellpadding="3px">
     <tr>
         <th colspan="8">
             <a href="http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Latestproducts/970540FBE241B359CA257410000FBB30?opendocument">
             Firearm Deaths in Australia 2006, with <acronym
             title="International Statistical Classification of Diseases
             and Related Health Problems">ICD</acronym> codes</a> Version 3</th>
     </tr>
     <tr>
         <th colspan="3">Assault</th>
         <th colspan="3">Suicide</th>
         <th>Accidental</th>
         <th>Total</th>
     </tr>
 
     <tr>
         <td>X94</td>
         <td>X95</td>
         <td>X93 or Not Recorded</td>
 
         <td>X73</td>
         <td>X74</td>
         <td>X72 Est</td>
 
         <td>W20-W49 minus W26</td>
 
         <td>&nbsp;</td>
     </tr>
 
     <tr>
         <td>8.25</td>
         <td>7.5</td>
         <td>15</td>
 
         <td>25</td>
         <td>4</td>
         <td>4.4</td>
 
         <td>25</td>
 
         <td>89.15</td>
     </tr>
 
     <tr>
         <th colspan="3">Number of Legally owned firearms</th>
         <th colspan="2">&nbsp;</th>
         <th colspan="3">Firearm Deaths per 100,000 firearms</th>
     </tr>
 
     <tr>
         <td colspan="3">2,500,000</td>
         <td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td>
         <td colspan="3">3.57</td>
     </tr>
 </table>
 
 <p>Here we show deaths by motor vehicle. There's really not much to say about
 this one except the results: <b>10.64</b> motor vehicle deaths per 100,000
 registered motor vehicles, and <b>23.45</b> motorbike deaths per 100,000 registered
 motorbikes.</p>
 
 <table border="1px solid" cellspacing="0px" cellpadding="3px">
     <tr>
         <th colspan="5">
             <a href="http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Latestproducts/970540FBE241B359CA257410000FBB30?opendocument">
             Motor vehicle Deaths in Australia 2006, with <acronym
             title="International Statistical Classification of Diseases
             and Related Health Problems">ICD</acronym> codes</a></th>
     </tr>
 
     <tr>
         <th>Pedestrians</th>
         <th>Motorcyclists</th>
         <th>Occupant of Car</th>
         <th>Occupant of Pickup or Van</th>
         <th>Total</th>
     </tr>
 
     <tr>
         <td>V03</td>
         <td>V23</td>
         <td>V40-V49</td>
         <td>V50-V59</td>
         <td>&nbsp;</td>
     </tr>
 
     <tr>
         <td>168</td>
         <td>87</td>
         <td>811</td>
         <td>48</td>
         <td>1114</td>
     </tr>
 
     <tr>
         <th colspan="3px">
             <a href="http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/ProductsbyReleaseDate/06010F4E7D145276CA257394000EC89A?OpenDocument">
             Number of registered motor vehicles</a></th>
         <th colspan="2px">Deaths per 100,000</th>
     </tr>
 
     <tr>
         <td>Cars</td>
         <td>Motorbikes</td>
         <td>Total</td>
         <td>Cars &amp; Motorbikes</td>
         <td>Motorbikes Only</td>
     </tr>
 
     <tr>
         <td>10,101,441</td>
         <td>370,982</td>
         <td>10,472,423</td>
         <td>10.64</td>
         <td>23.45</td>
     </tr>
 </table>
 
 <p>The results are in. Motorbikes and cars combined are nearly three times as
 dangerous firearms (as measured by deaths per 100,000 register vehicles/firearms).
 While motorbikes alone are over <b>six times as likely to kill someone as
     firearms</b>. So the next time someone suggests banning firearms, ask them what they think
 about banning motorbikes.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.timp.com.au/deaths_by_firearms_in_comparison_to_deaths_by_motor_vehicles%3A2008-12-20%3AJurisprudence%2CPolitics%2CSelf-Defense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<title>Kiwi Shop Owners want guns
</title>
<link>http://blog.timp.com.au/kiwi_shop_owners_want_guns%3A2008-06-10%3APolitics%2CSelf-Defense</link>
<comments>http://blog.timp.com.au/kiwi_shop_owners_want_guns%3A2008-06-10%3APolitics%2CSelf-Defense#comments</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 23:03:54 +0200</pubDate>
<dc:creator>TimP</dc:creator>
<category>Politics</category>
<category>Self-Defense</category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.timp.com.au/kiwi_shop_owners_want_guns%3A2008-06-10%3APolitics%2CSelf-Defense/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <p><a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/06/10/2270299.htm">Good on
 [...]]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/06/10/2270299.htm">Good on
 them</a>. And, John Albertson, mate, while it does assure that all robberies are
 going to involve guns, it also ensures that the <i>innocent victims</i> will be
 at least as well armed as their attackers, which makes it worse for law-abiding
 citizens how? You do realise that using a position of power to make work
 conditions more dangerous is at very best negligent? Or perhaps your worried
 about the <i>violent</i> criminals, I'm no lawyer but I'm pretty sure making a
 deliberate effort to make the commission of crime easier, would make you an
 accessory.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.timp.com.au/kiwi_shop_owners_want_guns%3A2008-06-10%3APolitics%2CSelf-Defense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<title>LawDog on Self Defence
</title>
<link>http://blog.timp.com.au/lawdog_on_self_defence%3A2008-04-22%3ALinkage%2CPolitics%2CSelf-Defense</link>
<comments>http://blog.timp.com.au/lawdog_on_self_defence%3A2008-04-22%3ALinkage%2CPolitics%2CSelf-Defense#comments</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:03:54 +0200</pubDate>
<dc:creator>TimP</dc:creator>
<category>Linkage</category>
<category>Politics</category>
<category>Self-Defense</category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.timp.com.au/lawdog_on_self_defence%3A2008-04-22%3ALinkage%2CPolitics%2CSelf-Defense/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>I've just started reading <a
 [...]]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>I've just started reading <a
 href="http://thelawdogfiles.blogspot.com">LawDog</a>. One of the more
 interesting reads on his blog is his <a 
 href="http://thelawdogfiles.blogspot.com/2008/01/meditations-on-self-defence.html">Meditations
 on Self Defence</a>, I'm not sure if I entirely agree with it but it is still an
 interesting take on the issue of self-defence.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.timp.com.au/lawdog_on_self_defence%3A2008-04-22%3ALinkage%2CPolitics%2CSelf-Defense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<title>Guns
</title>
<link>http://blog.timp.com.au/guns%3A2008-02-11%3ALinkage%2CPolitics%2CSelf-Defense</link>
<comments>http://blog.timp.com.au/guns%3A2008-02-11%3ALinkage%2CPolitics%2CSelf-Defense#comments</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 23:03:54 +0200</pubDate>
<dc:creator>TimP</dc:creator>
<category>Linkage</category>
<category>Politics</category>
<category>Self-Defense</category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.timp.com.au/guns%3A2008-02-11%3ALinkage%2CPolitics%2CSelf-Defense/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>A couple more interesting links on gun control:</p>
 [...]]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>A couple more interesting links on gun control:</p>
 <p>The Munchkin Wrangler: <a
 href="http://munchkinwrangler.wordpress.com/2007/03/23/why-the-gun-is-civilization/">Why
 the Gun is Civilization</a>, a blogger's argument against gun control</p>
 <p>Reason Magazine: <a href="http://www.reason.com/news/show/118708.html">Guns
 Don't Kill People, Gun Control Kills People</a>, an article about gun control in
 Uganda.</p>
 <p>Both links courtesy of <a
 href="http://www.samizdata.net/blog/archives/2007/11/why_the_gun_is.html">Samizdata.net</a>.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.timp.com.au/guns%3A2008-02-11%3ALinkage%2CPolitics%2CSelf-Defense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<title>A Nation of Cowards
</title>
<link>http://blog.timp.com.au/a_nation_of_cowards%3A2008-02-04%3ALinkage%2CSelf-Defense</link>
<comments>http://blog.timp.com.au/a_nation_of_cowards%3A2008-02-04%3ALinkage%2CSelf-Defense#comments</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 23:03:53 +0200</pubDate>
<dc:creator>TimP</dc:creator>
<category>Linkage</category>
<category>Self-Defense</category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.timp.com.au/a_nation_of_cowards%3A2008-02-04%3ALinkage%2CSelf-Defense/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>While Jeffrey R. Snyder's "<a href="http://www.rkba.org/comment/cowards.html">
 [...]]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>While Jeffrey R. Snyder's "<a href="http://www.rkba.org/comment/cowards.html">
 A Nation of Cowards</a>" may be a bit extreme in some areas, it is well worth a
 read and careful consideration for it's general applicability to self-defense
 and not just gun control.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.timp.com.au/a_nation_of_cowards%3A2008-02-04%3ALinkage%2CSelf-Defense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<title>Every Man Should Have A Rifle
</title>
<link>http://blog.timp.com.au/every_man_should_have_a_rifle%3A2007-11-09%3APoetry%2CPolitics%2CSelf-Defense</link>
<comments>http://blog.timp.com.au/every_man_should_have_a_rifle%3A2007-11-09%3APoetry%2CPolitics%2CSelf-Defense#comments</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 23:03:53 +0200</pubDate>
<dc:creator>TimP</dc:creator>
<category>Poetry</category>
<category>Politics</category>
<category>Self-Defense</category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.timp.com.au/every_man_should_have_a_rifle%3A2007-11-09%3APoetry%2CPolitics%2CSelf-Defense/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <pre>So I sit and write and ponder, while the house is deaf and dumb,
 [...]]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<pre>So I sit and write and ponder, while the house is deaf and dumb,
 Seeing visions "over yonder" of the war I know must come.
 In the corner - not a vision - but a sign for coming days
 Stand a box of ammunition and a rifle in green baize.
 And in this, the living present, let the word go through the land,
 Every tradesman, clerk and peasant should have these two things at hand.
 
 No - no ranting song is needed, and no meeting, flag or fuss -
 In the future, still unheeded, shall the spirit come to us!
 Without feathers, drum or riot on the day that is to be,
 We shall march down, very quiet, to our stations by the sea.
 While the bitter parties stifle every voice that warns of war,
 Every man should own a rifle and have cartridges in store!</pre>
 <p><a
 href="http://www.sanjeev.net/poetry/lawson-henry/every-man-should-have-a-rifle-183860.html">Every
 Man Should Have A Rifle</a> by <a
 href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Lawson">Henry Lawson</a>.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.timp.com.au/every_man_should_have_a_rifle%3A2007-11-09%3APoetry%2CPolitics%2CSelf-Defense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
