<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-15"?>
<!-- generator="Kukkaisvoima version 15" -->
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>
<channel>
<title>Tim's Bits and Pieces: Gadgets</title>
<link>http://blog.timp.com.au</link>
<description>My personal blog, covering many random topics</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:03:54 +0200</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:03:54 +0200</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://23.fi/kukkaisvoima/</generator>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>Shortwave
</title>
<link>http://blog.timp.com.au/shortwave%3A2010-04-13%3AGadgets%2CScience</link>
<comments>http://blog.timp.com.au/shortwave%3A2010-04-13%3AGadgets%2CScience#comments</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:03:54 +0200</pubDate>
<dc:creator>TimP</dc:creator>
<category>Gadgets</category>
<category>Science</category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.timp.com.au/shortwave%3A2010-04-13%3AGadgets%2CScience/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>Normally bloggers get excited about the latest and greatest gadgets like the
 [...]]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Normally bloggers get excited about the latest and greatest gadgets like the
 iPad or the latest netbook; me I'm excited about about technology that was
 invented in the 1920's. I was recently looking around for a battery powered
 radio receiver in case of emergencies, and I noticed some of the more expensive
 ones had Shortwave, so I ordered one. Today it arrived by courier, and it's
 really neat. I can receive transmissions from different parts of Asia, and all
 over Australia. Plus it seems to be a fairly good FM radio, which is what I
 actually got it for. I've already learnt a couple of things as well: 1, Sports
 news isn't any more interesting in a Chinese accent, and 2, there is no chance
 of me understanding spoken Indonesian unless I improve a lot. :-)</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.timp.com.au/shortwave%3A2010-04-13%3AGadgets%2CScience/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<title>Pilot 78G
</title>
<link>http://blog.timp.com.au/pilot_78g%3A2010-01-11%3AGadgets</link>
<comments>http://blog.timp.com.au/pilot_78g%3A2010-01-11%3AGadgets#comments</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 23:03:54 +0200</pubDate>
<dc:creator>TimP</dc:creator>
<category>Gadgets</category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.timp.com.au/pilot_78g%3A2010-01-11%3AGadgets/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>Based on a recommendation from <a
 [...]]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Based on a recommendation from <a
     href='http://munchkinwrangler.wordpress.com/2009/12/28/monday-search-term-safari-lxxx/'>Marko
     Kloos</a> (Down the bottom) I've purchased myself a fountain pen, a Pilot
 78G, plus a bottle of Parker Quink ink. All in all this set me back about $28
 including pen, ink, and postage on the pen.</p>
 
 <p>As an aside you can tell I'm new to the concept of fountain pens, since it
 didn't even occur to me to order some ink at the same time, and I had to rush
 out to the local stationary store on Saturday to acquire some. Unfortunately it
 turns out the inconsiderate sods who run the place don't open on the weekend :-),
 so I had to wait the whole weekend before I could get some ink.</p>
 
 <p>Now on to the pen itself:</p>
 <p style='text-align:center;'><a href='http://static.timp.com.au/images/2010-01-11_78g_large.jpg'><img
     src='http://static.timp.com.au/images/2010-01-11_78g_small.jpg' alt='The 78G and a bottle of ink.' /></a></p>
 
 <p>As you can see it's a fairly plain looking green pen, with subtle gold
 highlights. I feel that the plain look, with a few highlights strikes the right
 balance between looks and functionality for an everyday pen. The fancy
 gold-plated pens (<a href='http://www.sheaffer.com/writing/egypt/'>example</a>)
 are more of a status symbol that an tool, and a status symbol wasn't what I
 wanted. Plus the gold-plated ones are kind of expensive. :-)</p>
 
 <p>What you may not be able to see in the above picture is that it is a fine
 point. (An Asian fine point, which is apparently extra fine by western
 standards) For some reason I find the narrower text of fine point pens more
 attractive.</p>
 
 <p>The only problem with the pen itself I've had so far is that it's a screw cap
 which isn't as convenient for taking quick notes as a normal clip on cap, but
 that's minor.</p>
 
 <p>I've also had some problems adjusting to the slightly different technique
 between fountain pens and the more typical ballpoints, but just writing this
 post out longhand before typing it has helped. Which is a bit of a different
 experience for me as well, since I haven't wrote anything, but quick notes since
 highschool, and even then it was normally with a pencil.</p>
 
 <p>See below for an example of the writing with this pen. The Pilot 78G is on
 the top with a cheap ballpoint next and a Bic 537R rollerball at the bottom.
 The Bic's the only other pen I have that competes with with the Pilot, since
 it's a little less scratchy (to be expected with a fine nib), but it's a much
 broader line, and has significant bleedthrough. Unfortunately this image doesn't
 really capture it very well, but scanning in some text is the done thing. ;-)</p>
 <p style='text-align:center;'><a href='http://static.timp.com.au/images/2010-01-11_78g_writing_large.jpg'><img
     src='http://static.timp.com.au/images/2010-01-11_78g_writing_small.jpg' alt='Writing from the Pilot 78G, and two
 other pens.' /></a></p>
 
 <p>P.S. There is also no real bleedthrough on the paper with the new fountain
 pen, just incase you where wondering.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.timp.com.au/pilot_78g%3A2010-01-11%3AGadgets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<title>Swiss Army Knives
</title>
<link>http://blog.timp.com.au/swiss_army_knives%3A2009-06-29%3AReviews%2CGadgets</link>
<comments>http://blog.timp.com.au/swiss_army_knives%3A2009-06-29%3AReviews%2CGadgets#comments</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 23:03:54 +0200</pubDate>
<dc:creator>TimP</dc:creator>
<category>Reviews</category>
<category>Gadgets</category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.timp.com.au/swiss_army_knives%3A2009-06-29%3AReviews%2CGadgets/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>My first knife was one of those cheap, nasty Swiss Army Knife clones. I loved
 [...]]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>My first knife was one of those cheap, nasty Swiss Army Knife clones. I loved
 it when I first got it, but I grew out of it and it was such low quality that it
 put me of the whole idea of "Swiss Army Knives". I'm pleased to say I'm now
 cured of this dislike; I recently saw a cheap ($22.45) <a
     href="http://www.swissarmy.com/MultiTools/Pages/Product.aspx?category=doityourself&amp;product=53101">Victorinox
     Tinker</a> on eBay. I'm glad I did; it's currently my very favourite knife,
 though so far I've avoided the temptation to name it "Vera". :-)</p>
 
 <p>So if you're like me and don't like Swiss Army Knives because you got a cheap
 one once, do yourself a favour and go buy a cheaper Victorinox or Wenger knife
 Today, preferably one of the ones without a hundred and one tools. The Tinker is
 good in that regard, I can actually see myself using all the tools (except maybe
 the bottle opener), and the only tool it's really missing is a pair of scissors
 (perhaps the <a
     href="http://www.swissarmy.com/MultiTools/Pages/Product.aspx?category=doityourself&amp;product=53341">Super
     Tinker</a> would be a bit better)</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.timp.com.au/swiss_army_knives%3A2009-06-29%3AReviews%2CGadgets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
