<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-15"?>
<!-- generator="Kukkaisvoima version 15" -->
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>
<channel>
<title>Tim's Bits and Pieces: Environment</title>
<link>http://blog.timp.com.au</link>
<description>My personal blog, covering many random topics</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 23:03:54 +0200</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 23:03:54 +0200</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://23.fi/kukkaisvoima/</generator>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>Mountain Lions
</title>
<link>http://blog.timp.com.au/mountain_lions%3A2010-07-13%3AEnvironment%2CLinkage%2COddities</link>
<comments>http://blog.timp.com.au/mountain_lions%3A2010-07-13%3AEnvironment%2CLinkage%2COddities#comments</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 23:03:54 +0200</pubDate>
<dc:creator>TimP</dc:creator>
<category>Environment</category>
<category>Linkage</category>
<category>Oddities</category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.timp.com.au/mountain_lions%3A2010-07-13%3AEnvironment%2CLinkage%2COddities/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>Look at the cute little <a
 [...]]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Look at the cute little <a
 	href='http://mcintyrehunts.com/wordpress/?p=216'>Lion</a>; isn't it
 adorable? :-)</p>
 
 <p><a
 	href='http://booksbikesboomsticks.blogspot.com/2010/07/lions-and-tigers.html'>Hattip</a></p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.timp.com.au/mountain_lions%3A2010-07-13%3AEnvironment%2CLinkage%2COddities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<title>Criticized for not killing a protected animal
</title>
<link>http://blog.timp.com.au/criticized_for_not_killing_a_protected_animal%3A2010-01-01%3AEnvironment%2COddities</link>
<comments>http://blog.timp.com.au/criticized_for_not_killing_a_protected_animal%3A2010-01-01%3AEnvironment%2COddities#comments</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 23:03:53 +0200</pubDate>
<dc:creator>TimP</dc:creator>
<category>Environment</category>
<category>Oddities</category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.timp.com.au/criticized_for_not_killing_a_protected_animal%3A2010-01-01%3AEnvironment%2COddities/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>A family in Cairns is being criticized
 [...]]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>A family in Cairns is being criticized
     in the comments on <a
     href="http://www.cairns.com.au/article/2009/12/30/85095_local-news.html">this
     article</a> for not saving a joey from a large python. With some of the
 comments I don't know whether to laugh or cry.</p>
 
 <p>From the category of "Don't understand the difference between humans
 and wallabies"<a href="#note_1_20100101">*</a> we have:</p>
 <blockquote>
     I still think this family was wrong in just letting the snake eat the joey.
     How disgusting that they just stood and watched it without trying to do
     anything. Would they just stand and watch it if it were a child being
     eaten.....I think not. These adults are disgusting and teaching their kids
     the wrong thing. <i>Linda G of Perth</i>
 </blockquote>
 
 <p>Then we have some comments from people that don't understand that <i>snakes need
     to eat</i>:</p>
 <blockquote>
     I know this is nature but how on earth could this family standby and watch
     this poor little wallaby
     get killed? Not only that, they took pictures so they could get in the
     paper!!!!! I'm not suggesting
     the kill the python at all but surely they could have helped the little
     wallaby????
 </blockquote>
 
 <p>On the other hand with some comments I know exactly where I stand:</p>
 
 <blockquote>
     I blame this on climate change / global warming whatever you want to call
     it.... <i>MK</i>
 </blockquote>
 
 <p>:-)</p>
 
 <p id="note_1_20100101">*. Of course as <a
     href="/archives/2008/11/15/woman_pretending_to_be_a_man_fails/">a
     self-identified kangaroo</a> I must admit that it would be different if
 it where a kangaroo, but no one likes <i>wallabies</i>. :-)</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.timp.com.au/criticized_for_not_killing_a_protected_animal%3A2010-01-01%3AEnvironment%2COddities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<title>Private Property
</title>
<link>http://blog.timp.com.au/private_property%3A2009-12-30%3AEconomics%2CEnvironment%2CPolitics%2CSocialism</link>
<comments>http://blog.timp.com.au/private_property%3A2009-12-30%3AEconomics%2CEnvironment%2CPolitics%2CSocialism#comments</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 23:03:54 +0200</pubDate>
<dc:creator>TimP</dc:creator>
<category>Economics</category>
<category>Environment</category>
<category>Politics</category>
<category>Socialism</category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.timp.com.au/private_property%3A2009-12-30%3AEconomics%2CEnvironment%2CPolitics%2CSocialism/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>... Labour doesn't respect it. (Not that the Coalition are necessarily much
 [...]]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>... Labour doesn't respect it. (Not that the Coalition are necessarily much
 better) <a
     href="http://www.news.com.au/national/dying-for-a-chat-with-kevin-rudd/story-e6frfkw9-1225814293079">Man
     Protests decision to make his farm a carbon sink</a>:</p>
 <blockquote>
     <p>As his health begins to fail, protesting farmer Peter Spencer swore
     yesterday he would die before giving in to a Federal Government decision to
     make his farm a carbon sink.</p>
 
     <p>Mr Spencer ... claims the government declared his property in Shannons Flat,
     north of Cooma, a carbon sink without offering any compensation. He says the
     move has left him unable to earn a living because he cannot clear land and
     redevelop the farm.</p>
 
     <p>A spokesperson for Mr Rudd said ... "The Government sets policy in the national interest. This policy will
     not be changed by threats of violence or self-harm.</p>
 </blockquote>
 ]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.timp.com.au/private_property%3A2009-12-30%3AEconomics%2CEnvironment%2CPolitics%2CSocialism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<title>Roos 'on the Brink of Extinction'
</title>
<link>http://blog.timp.com.au/roos_on_the_brink_of_extinction%3A2008-08-12%3AHumour%2CEnvironment</link>
<comments>http://blog.timp.com.au/roos_on_the_brink_of_extinction%3A2008-08-12%3AHumour%2CEnvironment#comments</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 23:03:54 +0200</pubDate>
<dc:creator>TimP</dc:creator>
<category>Humour</category>
<category>Environment</category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.timp.com.au/roos_on_the_brink_of_extinction%3A2008-08-12%3AHumour%2CEnvironment/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>Four wildlife groups are claiming that kangaroos are <a
 [...]]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Four wildlife groups are claiming that kangaroos are <a
 href="http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,24165654-29277,00.html">"on the brink of
 extinction"</a> in three Australian states. If you read to the end of the article you find that that means they
 believe that "there are less than five kangaroos per square kilometre across
 most of <acronym title="New South Wales">NSW</acronym>, South Australia and
 Queensland". OK, even accepting their figures on face value according to <a
 href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/">Wikipedia</a> the land areas of these three
 state are 809,444 <acronym title="Square Kilometres">sq km</acronym>, 1,043,514 <acronym title="Square Kilometres">sq km</acronym>, and 1,852,642 <acronym title="Square Kilometres">sq km</acronym> respectively, for a
 total of 3,705,600 <acronym title="Square Kilometres">sq km</acronym>. In other
 words they believe that because kangaroo numbers between those three states have
 dropped below approximately 18,528,000 they are now "on the brink of extinction".</p>
 <p>OK, lets see what <i>other</i> animals are also "on the brink of extinction".
 First up: Cows according to the figures available from <a
 href="http://www.mla.com.au/AudienceHierarchy/Students/default.htm">Meat &amp;
 Livestock Australia</a> we get a total of approximately 19.5 million cows in
 those three states, well that is a little worrying, but there not quite "on the
 brink of extinction"... yet.  OK, how about Cats? According to statistics from
 <a href="http://www.petnet.com.au/petstatistics.asp">PetNet</a> those three
 states (and the <acronym title="Northern Territory">NT</acronym>) have between
 them a minuscule total of 1,474,000 domestic cats. Oh well, it's not like I'm
 overly fond of cats anyhow. (Obviously there are also some feral cats, but there
 numbers would not be sufficient to put cat numbers over the 18.5 million "brink
 of extinction" mark) Well since the cats are goners, what about Dogs? Again from
 PetNet we get 2,411,000, darn it, while it's a bit better than the cats, their
 still quite blatantly facing extinction as well.</p>
 <p>Wait a second, what about Humans? Going back to Wikipedia we find that these
 three states populations are: 6,889,100 (<acronym title="New South
 Wales">NSW</acronym>), 1,584,500 (<acronym title="South
 Australia">SA</acronym>), and 4,182,100 (<acronym
 title="Queensland">QLD</acronym>), or 12,655,700. Oh no,
 <i><em>Humans</em></i> are "on the brink of extinction".</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.timp.com.au/roos_on_the_brink_of_extinction%3A2008-08-12%3AHumour%2CEnvironment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ice-Free North Pole?
</title>
<link>http://blog.timp.com.au/ice-free_north_pole%3A2008-07-01%3AEnvironment</link>
<comments>http://blog.timp.com.au/ice-free_north_pole%3A2008-07-01%3AEnvironment#comments</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 23:03:54 +0200</pubDate>
<dc:creator>TimP</dc:creator>
<category>Environment</category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.timp.com.au/ice-free_north_pole%3A2008-07-01%3AEnvironment/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>Apparently an <a
 [...]]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Apparently an <a
 href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/06/28/2288618.htm">US "Expert"
 believes that the North Pole may have an ice-free period this year</a>.
 The reason expert is in inverted commas, is because apparently Mr. Serreze, a
 scientist from the National Snow and Ice Data Centre, believes that this has
 "certainly not [happened before] in modern times", since most people consider <a
 href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/888235.stm">2000</a> to be "modern
 times" I'm forced to concluded that Mr. Serreze is a moron or a liar. Either
 way, his opinions are largely irrelevant.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.timp.com.au/ice-free_north_pole%3A2008-07-01%3AEnvironment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fuel prices WILL rise under carbon trading scheme
</title>
<link>http://blog.timp.com.au/fuel_prices_will_rise_under_carbon_trading_scheme%3A2008-06-26%3APolitics%2CEnvironment</link>
<comments>http://blog.timp.com.au/fuel_prices_will_rise_under_carbon_trading_scheme%3A2008-06-26%3APolitics%2CEnvironment#comments</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:03:53 +0200</pubDate>
<dc:creator>TimP</dc:creator>
<category>Politics</category>
<category>Environment</category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.timp.com.au/fuel_prices_will_rise_under_carbon_trading_scheme%3A2008-06-26%3APolitics%2CEnvironment/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <p><a
 [...]]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><a
 href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/06/25/2285767.htm">Apparently
 Kevin Rudd won't rule out a rise in fuel prices under his new carbon trading
 scheme</a>. What the ...? Does no one else realise that "carbon trading" is
 basically just forcing people who use fuel to pay another fee? Of course carbon
 trading will cause fuel prices to go up!</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.timp.com.au/fuel_prices_will_rise_under_carbon_trading_scheme%3A2008-06-26%3APolitics%2CEnvironment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<title>Global Cooling
</title>
<link>http://blog.timp.com.au/global_cooling%3A2008-04-25%3AOddities%2CEnvironment</link>
<comments>http://blog.timp.com.au/global_cooling%3A2008-04-25%3AOddities%2CEnvironment#comments</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 23:03:53 +0200</pubDate>
<dc:creator>TimP</dc:creator>
<category>Oddities</category>
<category>Environment</category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.timp.com.au/global_cooling%3A2008-04-25%3AOddities%2CEnvironment/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <p><i><a
 [...]]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><i><a
 href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23583376-7583,00.html">Sorry
 to ruin the fun, but an ice age cometh</a></i>, via <a
 href="http://www.theothersideofkim.com/index.php/tos/single/18542">Kim du
 Toit</a>.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.timp.com.au/global_cooling%3A2008-04-25%3AOddities%2CEnvironment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<title>Carbon Debits
</title>
<link>http://blog.timp.com.au/carbon_debits%3A2008-04-16%3AHumour%2CEnvironment%2COddities</link>
<comments>http://blog.timp.com.au/carbon_debits%3A2008-04-16%3AHumour%2CEnvironment%2COddities#comments</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:03:53 +0200</pubDate>
<dc:creator>TimP</dc:creator>
<category>Humour</category>
<category>Environment</category>
<category>Oddities</category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.timp.com.au/carbon_debits%3A2008-04-16%3AHumour%2CEnvironment%2COddities/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <p><a href="http://www.carboncreditkillers.com/">Carbon Debits</a> for when you
 [...]]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><a href="http://www.carboncreditkillers.com/">Carbon Debits</a> for when you
 realise that increased water temperature = increased evaporation = increased
 rainfall = end of the drought.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.timp.com.au/carbon_debits%3A2008-04-16%3AHumour%2CEnvironment%2COddities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<title>Not Conservative
</title>
<link>http://blog.timp.com.au/not_conservative%3A2008-03-28%3APolitics%2CEnvironment</link>
<comments>http://blog.timp.com.au/not_conservative%3A2008-03-28%3APolitics%2CEnvironment#comments</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 23:03:54 +0200</pubDate>
<dc:creator>TimP</dc:creator>
<category>Politics</category>
<category>Environment</category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.timp.com.au/not_conservative%3A2008-03-28%3APolitics%2CEnvironment/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>The Federal Opposition (The Coalition) is far from conservative. <a
 [...]]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>The Federal Opposition (The Coalition) is far from conservative. <a
 href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/03/28/2201425.htm">Case in
 point</a>.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.timp.com.au/not_conservative%3A2008-03-28%3APolitics%2CEnvironment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<title>Heh
</title>
<link>http://blog.timp.com.au/heh%3A2008-03-25%3APolitics%2CEnvironment%2COddities</link>
<comments>http://blog.timp.com.au/heh%3A2008-03-25%3APolitics%2CEnvironment%2COddities#comments</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 23:03:54 +0200</pubDate>
<dc:creator>TimP</dc:creator>
<category>Politics</category>
<category>Environment</category>
<category>Oddities</category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.timp.com.au/heh%3A2008-03-25%3APolitics%2CEnvironment%2COddities/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <p><a href="http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,23420860-2,00.html">This</a>
 [...]]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><a href="http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,23420860-2,00.html">This</a>
 amuses me. Apparently the "Power companies say they need carbon trade
 compensation".</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.timp.com.au/heh%3A2008-03-25%3APolitics%2CEnvironment%2COddities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
